Durkheim and the dynamic density
Thus durkheim distinguishes between different levels of social density and these, in turn, give rise to different kinds of belief systems thus, for example, in a complex urban society, “the personification of social and natural processes gives way to abstract concepts” (189) the transition, however, isn’t uniform. Born april 15th, 1858 began his education in a rabbinical school, but decided not to follow his father at college d'epinal, durkheim was an outstanding student that he skipped 2 years. •dynamic density (durkheim) – cities develop, populations grow – more people in a smaller space (city) – these people interact with one another more – division of labor increased, capitalism ensued. Thus, durkheim argued that the division of labor varies in direct ratio to the dynamic or moral density of society cf the preface to the second edition of the division of labor in society (1902a. Abstract the source of social life, according to durkheim, is the similitude of consciousnesses and the division of labor the former is best evident among primitive societies where a “mechanical solidarity,” evidenced by repressive law, prevails the latter in advanced societies where populations evidence greater “dynamic density,” and juridical rules define the nature and relations.
Dynamic density, according to durkheim, refers to the people of a certain society and their role they play in that society a major problem that arises in dynamic density in a mechanical society is that when a society grows in numbers, conflict arises due to the fact that people will be competing against one another. Dynamic density is another important factor in durkheim’s study of solidarity dynamic density is the number of people in a society and the amount of interaction that occurs among them an increase in population will result in an increase in social interaction which leads to a change in mechanical or organic solidarity. Emile durkheim is best known in this country as a great sociologist and methodologist yet it was durkheim’s reflections on morality and society that spoke most deeply of his vital concerns. “dynamic density may be defined as the function of the number of individuals who are actually having not only commercial but also social relations, ie who not only exchange services or compete with one another but also live a common life.
Durkheim believed that society is the source of morality therefore, he also believed that society could be reformed, especially through moral education according to durkheim, morality is composed of three elements: discipline, attachment, and autonomy. The concentration of mass, that is to say the dynamic density or the degree of coalescence of social segments, the material density of the population reflects only imperfectly it is observed that the social strength is an increasing function of each of these factors. For example, in describing the shift from mechanical solidarity to organic solidarity he focused on several criteria, including the quality and quantity of individuals’ connections to one another, as expressed by the idea of dynamic density, and by the level of the division of labor.
The rate at which individuals come into contact and interact with one another is what durkheim calls moral or dynamic density the most important change to take place as a result of increased moral density occurs on a structural level and is what durkheim calls the division of labor. Dynamic density which is increase in population and an increase in interaction among them is also an example of social fact non-material social fact includes collective consciences, which refers to the “the totality of beliefs and sentiments common to average citizens of the same society form a determinate system which has its own life. According to durkheim, in order for an increase in dynamic density to occur, there must be two existing components: “the first is simply [an increase in] the sheer number of people in society [the second being] an increase in the amount of interaction that takes place among the greater number of people in society” (ritzer, 2013.
Durkheim and the dynamic density
Durkheim envisioned a historical transformation from mechanical to organic solidarity this idea is clearly different from comte’s model of social change changes in dynamic density what causes the change from mechanical to organic solidarity durkheim’s answer is that the transformation results from an increase in the ynamic. Merton argues that durkheim has no empirical evidence supporting a link between dynamic density and a change from mechanical to organic solidarity durkheim argued that anomie is found within an individual s transition from mechanical to organic solidarity , and is escaped when this transition is successfully completed. Deals with classical sociological theory in greater depth than it is covered in this emile durkheim (1858-1917) built on the work of the french social theorist increase in dynamic density leads to the transformation from mechanical to organic soham y emile durlcheim.
- Durkheim referred to the moment in time (and history) when a society begins transitioning from mechanical solidarity to organic solidarity as dynamic density.
- Durkheim introduced a concept called dynamic density, which refers to the number of people in society, and amount of interactions among them as the population increases, the competition for scarce resources increases as well.
Durkheim says it is the increase in the dynamic density â dynamic density: the number of people and the frequency of interaction an increase in dynamic density leads to transformation from mechanical to organic solidarity. Durkheim says it is the increase in the dynamic density dynamic density: the number of people and the frequency of interaction an increase in dynamic density leads to transformation from mechanical. Durkheim attempted to explain the division of labor in society by the influence of such factors as dynamic density and suicide rate – by the degree of integration and regulation of the social groups.